Âé¶¹Ö±²¥

Controlling Descent From on High: The X-24

Controlling Descent From on High: The X-24
March 28, 2018
Facebook

From afar, it appeared as if the massive B-52 flying from Edwards Air Force Base on March 19, 1970, had shed a single silver tear into an endless expanse of piercing blue sky.

A closer looked revealed that it was a teardrop-shaped aircraft¡ªwithout wings. It descended¡ªas if in a state of free-fall¡ªuntil its pilot, Jerauld Gentry, ignited a rocket engine, propelling the strange vehicle higher into the sky at speeds approaching Mach 1.

Gentry then allowed the aircraft to descend sharply, like a streaking hang glider, maneuvering it toward the ground, where he performed an unpowered landing on the expansive dry lakebed near the base.

Air Force and NASA officials breathed a sigh of relief. Gentry¡¯s landing of Martin Marietta¡¯s extraordinary X-24A ¡°lift body¡± plane had proven what many scientists had thought impossible: that a wingless aircraft could descend from the upper atmosphere and glide safely back to Earth.

The grandfather of the modern space shuttle had been born.

The rocket-powered X-24A lifting body research vehicle with B-52 mother ship.

Proving the Concept

Prior to 1957, the concept of a lifting body aircraft¡ªa wingless vehicle that obtains lift from its aerodynamic shape¡ªwas thought to be pure science fiction.

But work by Dr. Alfred J. Eggers Jr. showed that by altering a symmetrical nose cone shape, it was more likely to survive reentry from space. Find the right wingless shape, the theory went, and a safe return from space to Earth might be possible.

In 1966, after conducting experiments to test the wingless concept, including towing prototypes from a hopped-up Pontiac convertible driving 120 mph, NASA and the U.S. Air Force turned to Martin Marietta.

The X-24A would soon emerge, its teardrop shape provided lift while the inclusion of three vertical fins allowed pilots to stabilize the vehicle during a rapid descent. With Gentry at the helm, the X-24A proved that an aircraft could indeed land unpowered after descending from the upper atmosphere.

X-24B

The Delta Shape

But in order to ensure more precise landings, more stability was needed. In response, Martin engineers created a triangular shell to fit over the X-24A¡¯s existing frame. What once looked like a nubby potato was now delta-shaped, flat on the bottom with a rounded top. The redesign doubled the X-24A¡¯s lifting surface and improved its handling, allowing it to land on shorter surfaces.

On August 5, 1972, the X-24B made the first successful landing of a lifting body vehicle on a conventional airplane runway, writing the playbook for future Space Shuttle landings for decades to come.

The Teardrop Legacy

Lifting body vehicles, like the X-24A and X-24B, remained strong contenders for use by NASA in space until the invention of lightweight ceramic tiles by Âé¶¹Ö±²¥ Space Systems in the early 1970s. These tiles protected wings from the heat of reentry with minimum added weight. A tile-covered shuttle with wings and a rocket motor soon became more economical to build than lifting body vehicles, and the X-24 program¡¯s viability drew to a close.

But the spirit of the X-24 lived on. When NASA began work on a prototype vehicle for transporting astronauts back to Earth from the International Space Station in the mid-1990s, it was the X-24A¡¯s famous teardrop design that was chosen, a fitting tribute to a potato-shaped wonder that helped usher in a new era of manned space flight.

Sources and Additional Reading

  • Gorn, Michael H.?Expanding the Envelope: Flight Research at NACA and NASA. Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 2001.
  • NASA. ¡°Past Projects-Lifting Bodies.¡±, accessed August 2, 2012.
  • Reed, R. Dale, and Darlene Lister.?Wingless Flight: The Lifting Body Story. Lexington, Ky.: University Press of Kentucky, 2002.
  • Skaarup, Harold A.?Ohio Warbird Survivors 2003: A Handbook on Where to Find Them. iUniverse, 2003.